Jump to content

backinthetrees

member
  • Posts

    1097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by backinthetrees

  1. i miss you, duck-frog. you are a dog and a duck and a frog. but whatever mutation you are, i want to eat you; but if i dont, i want to watch you fuck. i'll look for your super partner, maybe a tigerXfish? and then i'll watch you talk and fuck, fuck and talk. getting to know each other without any clothes on (do duck frogs and tigerXfish wear clothes?). maybe after you guys will have some zany babies. and then everyone will die lol.

  2. Any of you cats have the new BBM? Hate how you gotta send/receive pictures on it, but it does have some cool features I guess. I just made a Superfuture group, so scan the barcode and join that shit.

    Superfuturebarcode.jpg

    barcode sez its not work liao

  3. Oh ya, I forgot about those LEGIT checks... Point? They were just legit checks... (-_- )zZz...

    Say you were "street"? Niggah, you imply it everywhere... Don't front like you don't.

    Ya, my son is growing up well, we've been actually potty training him as of late before he turns 3, pre-school coming up. Doing a pretty good job too... Need to be married just because I have a son? I don't advertise shit, I'm just showin' some nice buds. More funds even with a nice legit job is always a plus considering my girlfriend is still in school, homes aint cheap.

    i was potty trained by 18 months.

  4. what about if you can't seem to keep your high? i'm a daily smoker, but even when i go a week without smoking i can't keep my high for more than an hour.

    you have to allow the ganj to take over. i can PPP a j with 3 people, and a small j, too, and i can keep my state for up to 3 hours.

    you need to embrace it man.

  5. well if your use to the 18-55 focal range the 17-40L is a great upgrade

    very sharp in my opinion, but it might be out of your price range a little

    My top 3 picks (most to less expensive)

    1.)17-40L 17 - 40L review

    2.) Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

    3.) Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8

    please, canon 17-55 f2.8. will trounce all 3. 17-40 is good, but it requires so much light because of F4.

    then again, it really depends on what you're shooting.

    photography is the new dunk.

  6. you think? i was looking at both of them a bit and didnt see tons of support for the 1.4 over the 1.8, also what i saw/read on the 1.8 looked to be almost all good feedback.

    tell me more though if you dont mind. pm if you want, i need a nice prime portrait lens without spending an arm and a leg

    take both out and shoot with low light, and you'll understand. despite the 1.8 being 1.8 wide open, yes, it lets in a significant amount of light, but what's the point of having a fast lens with slow focusing speed?

    i have both lenses, and i'd definitely say to go for the 1.4.. it is that much better. and with all camera gear, really, you get what you pay for.

×
×
  • Create New...