Jump to content

macuser3of5

member
  • Posts

    852
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by macuser3of5

  1. This is probably the most I would be willing to spend. I've spent more, but I regret that nonsense:

    tees:$50

    polos:$100

    shirts l/s:$50

    dress shirts:$140

    suit:$1000

    jeans:$130

    shorts:$0

    sneakers:$140

    dress shoes:$300

    jackets:$200

    hoodies:$100

    belts:$60

    flipflops:$0

    facial care:? ... $20? How much do you need to spend on that?

  2. I FIGURED THIS THREAD WAS GOING TOO SMOOTHLY. SO I'M HERE TO /REALLY/ PISS PEOPLE OFF BY GOING STRAIGHT NIKETALK.

    I'M A RECOVERING HYPEBEAST. POSTING THIS PICTURE IS THE FIRST STEP OF THE HEALING PROCESS.

    shoes-1.jpg

    this is after i sold about 35 percent of my collection. i wish i knew how to quit dunks.

    My kitchen has never been more beautiful. ;_;

  3. No, they just sit higher up on your waist. IIRC, the LWCF sits right on your hips, very low. The cotton/silk jeans' waistband, by comparision sits right above/atop your hip bones. Do note that if you have extra 'meat' in that spot, compared to the width of your hips, the silk denim jeans are not going to make much in the way of accomodations. :P

    Edited by macuser3of5 on May 19, 2006 at 01:34 PM

    Edited by macuser3of5 on May 19, 2006 at 01:37 PM

  4. I'm curious as to which variation: 90/10 cotton/silk blend, or the 'cotton coated in silk' blend (whatever that means)? They're cut pretty much the same as the classic 5 pocket, though they run a bit slimmer and lower in the waist (could be the lack of give in the fabric). Nice stuff, I have one of each variation in my closet. The fabric in each is amazing. Compared to the LWCF cut, they are a straighter leg, and they sit higher in the waist, maybe about 1/2 inch or so.

    Also, do note that they are dry-clean ONLY (they will shrink a good size+ if you wash them), and do not expect them to stretch out or break in much, if at all (at least not in my experience). They aren't particularly forgiving., but they last extremely well. Mine look pretty much the same as when I bought them, and I've had one of the pairs for about 4 years.

    Edited by macuser3of5 on May 19, 2006 at 01:23 PM

  5. Quote: my bad, 350 dollars....still, a lot of money for a SHIRT. regardless of if i'm the target consumer or not, it's a bit ridiculous. i think it's funny that you and everyone else has been duped into thinking something can cost that much simply because it's supposedly "excellent quality", which i don't doubt....but you can't tell me that it's not the name you're paying for. if you make that kind of money to buy that shit and not flinch, then more power to you. what gets me is people who live in subpar living/jobs/etc trying to get shit like this because it has the name purple label (or whatever high designer name) behind it. i think people forget the fact that it is still a shirt, regardless of how well something is made or not. as far as your rl being inferior statement, i love rl and always have...but i guess i figured they'd stay away from price gouging like that. however, i'd much rather buy a stadium piece for that of kind price. arguing this is pointless, fashion is fashion...people will empty their funds for stuff like this so let them.

    ROFL, weclome to fashion, n00b.

    Edited by macuser3of5 on May 18, 2006 at 05:55 PM

  6. Quote:

    use youre mute button.

    --- Original message by UsVersusThem on May 6, 2006 09:11 AM

    Or the site developer can be smart and use a (gasp) really simple, standard flash container and incorporate a mute button, like the rest of the internet does.
  7. Superhint of the day:

    No matter what you wear, who you are, where you post... If the messageboard consists of a 99.9% male population busy complimenting each other on their nut-hugging, sperm-crushing raw denim jeans, dope kicks, or hot 'fits', it is G.A.Y.. Gayer than the dude wearing a pink D&G shirt and True Religion jeans in hopes of scoring babes at the mall. Gayer than an actual gay dude. So gay it isn't actually gay anymore, nor even a derogatory term, but instead a new gender entirely: Supergay; the supergender of otherwise straight men obsessed with impressing other dudes, through the vehicle of clothing, on the internet.

    So let's all just chill out and just keep looking at each other posing for the camera. Spread the love. Embrace the beauty of supergay in all of its forms.

    <3

    Edited by macuser3of5 on May 15, 2006 at 12:51 PM

×
×
  • Create New...