Jump to content

efujobu1

member
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by efujobu1

  1. On 1/27/2023 at 7:23 AM, Broark said:

    Here are mine! Keeping them raw for a bit and will wash them later after I wear the FW 37 and LB jeans a bit more.
    Overall I'm impressed with the denim and finishing. The stitching isn't particularly wonky as one would expect with a war-era pair, but that doesn't bother me.
    Also love the text on the patch / flasher. I went with the craft version (rusted hardware) but chose some that were not super rusty off the bat.
    MEYdO8n.jpg
    5DQ4KUr.jpg
    k0tE7by.jpg
    ufKZZEL.jpg
    nZPOvBJ.jpg
    Pbds2jy.jpg
    DIslajY.jpg
    MhIQ7yS.jpg
    rtJwmP2.jpg
    dPRiM0V.jpg
    apu9nHM.jpg
    nCFxqNG.jpg

    Man I’m tempted!

  2. On 10/5/2022 at 10:38 AM, rockon99 said:

    Sorry to bring up a month-old post…… 

    but do you find you get much shrink out of those Bronson shirts if you dry them? I recently grabbed a few and have been hang drying. 

    I have some of their shirts and yes, the shrinkage is noticeable especially in length.

  3. On 6/25/2022 at 3:35 AM, bartlebyyphonics said:

    looks like the new 30s jacket and jeans are both up on their store-site now...

    [not sure it is 'open' yet as it says 'sold-out' - presuming not actually taking orders as yet]

    on a quick look through numbers;

    looks like the jacket matches the jeans; giving them two new type ones; one boxier, but lighter denim [the 20s model discussed last page] and one heavier denim but longer body [with a body same-is length as their 40s & 50s]; which gives them four different type 1's in their roster: a 213, a 20s, a 30s, a 40s [a tip of the fedora to fête them for that feat...]

    in terms of jeans; the numbers (which are always to be taken with a pinch of salt iirc) suggest mid-to large-ish rise (they say so explicitly in their description, numbers wise, a 33 front rise for the w.38 I always look at) but a full leg shape [a 38cm thigh is what they claim for that size] ... both the rise and thigh [thus fullness of leg] seems a smidge more generous than the 20s [but the rise not as huge as the s40s]

    the fits they show both seem on the generous side [which I approve of] but sharing this one as I think it show the rise to thigh ratio that is going on...

    image.thumb.png.b7047cb1c3b35e4c448afe5ac9ecd91b.png

    Totally digging the way this fits.

  4. On 2/8/2022 at 4:04 AM, Signet said:

    size 38 raw on BOT 47 cut 

    raw - 18 1/4 waist , 13 1/4 front rise , 17 1/2 back rise , 13 3/4 thigh , 10 1/2 knee , 9 1/4 hem , 35 inseam

     

     

    after a hot wash and dry 

    16 1/4  waist , 12 1/2 f rise , 16 1/4 back rise , 13 1/8 thigh , 9 7/8 knee , 8 3/4 hem , 31 7/8 inseam 

     

    -- edie

    Damn that’s crazy shrinkage! I’d need a 38 myself if we ever get a chance to purchase. 

×
×
  • Create New...