Jump to content

Mobtown

member
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mobtown

  1. ¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█ lies lies lies ►

    ▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂

    ███▲ ▲ █ █ ███████

    ███████████████████████►

    ◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤

  2. New with tags Warehouse x BiG 660 size 32. (38 inseam version)

    The measurements on this pair are identical to those listed on BiGs charts. As follows:

    Front Rise: 11"

    Back Rise: 15.5"

    Waist: 36.5"

    Thigh: 13"

    Knee: 9.65"

    Hem: 8.75"

    Inseam: 38"

    $165 USD + 4% Paypal fee (you pay shipping). Located in Delaware if trying to estimate shipping cost

    PayPal only

    dwphoto1.jpg

    dwphoto2.jpg

    ****CONS SOLD****CONS SOLD****

  3. Was at BiG this weekend and tied a pair of Momos size 32 and they were pretty snug in the waist but fit well everywhere else. a good pre-soak silhouette. Does anyone with experience with the 201 cut have any opinion on the 1 inch shrinkage and .5 inch in thigh, leg, and knee that BiG shows? Is this pretty acurate?

    I can't use the any shrinkage in the waist but need a warm or hot soak to get the leg width to form a bit better: however, I fear that going up in waist size will kill the fit.

    Any help would be appreciated?

  4. Sorry in advance for clogging up the thread with a sizing question.

    I tried on a pair of size 35, #2000 no. 1 at BiG this weekend and like the fit but it seems a bit insane that the shrinkage on these is a possible 2.5" in the waist and only .75" round/ total (i.e. .375" measured on one side or not doubled) in the thigh, knee, hem. This info is what BIG told me. Seems like a huge discrepancy

    Does this seem accurate with other peoples experiences?

    The waist on the 35s were a bit snug but fit well everywhere else. I just cant see sizing up more to a 36 for a comfier waist when the leg won't shrink much in width?

    Any experience with these would be helpful.

×
×
  • Create New...