diggs99
-
Posts
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Store
supertorial
Classifieds
Posts posted by diggs99
-
-
bump bump only one item left
0 -
bump and bump
0 -
bump bump adump
0 -
bump bump bump
0 -
more price drops
0 -
bump . . .
0 -
Price Drops. Make a decent offer. I just don't want these pieces.
0 -
bump . . . bump
0 -
Bump bump adump
0 -
Bump. Minor price drops due to lower shipping charges.
0 -
Price Drops
Three items from the Uniqlo/Gilded age collaboration. All items are brand new with tags and unworn.
All Prices in US Dollars, Paypal preferred.
Shipping US Priority Mail Envelope: $5 (per item, will combine for multiple purchases)
All measurements are as close as I know how, not a professional seller.
Oxford Buttondown Tagged Size Large, Closer to a slim Medium.
Asking $40- - >$35 - - >$30
Light blue with yellow stripes.
Measurements (in inches):
Pit to Pit: 20.5
Shoulder seam to cuff: 25
Shoulder to Shoulder: 17.5
Lenght from top of collar to bottom of shirt: 30.
Khaki Pants Size Medium
Asking $50 - - > $45 - - >$40SOLD
Waist: 32
Length: 33.5
Jacket Tagged size Large, Closer to a slim medium
Asking $40 - - >$35 - - >$30SOLD
Pit to Pit: 21
Shoulder to Shoulder: 17.5
Shoulder seam to cuff: 25.5
Length from top of collar to bottom of Jacket: 29.5
Waist: 17.5
0 -
Is anyone actually attaching their tab? I am ambivalent and am leaning toward no. Any pictures of a pair or two with the tabs added?
0 -
yea i didnt get a redtab either
whats the deal with that?
never felt so left out before in my life
Its in the Coin pocket, it was right there in mine
0 -
this is what mine looked like post soak after sizing down one with 30's instead of 31's. If you look back further in the thread, you can see what they looked like pre soak. Those look really loose to me. I would go down at least one size from what you are wearing in the picture, just my 2 cents.
0 -
Here are my post soak pics. they were so stiff that they stood on their own just long enough to grab a picture. They soften up really quick. Odd texture too the denim almost rubbery haha. I am liking the fit, any comments?
Standing
0 -
Hey mine just arrived this morning! They are really gorgeous. I will definitely be getting them shortened. Soaking as we speak. I got 30's, usually wear 30-31's. Here are some pre soak fit pics. I am 5'5, 150.
0 -
I founded the company Denim Junkies - http://denimjunkies.net in 2000 the use of the name Denim Junkie is a blatant copyright violation.
Now if only US copyright applied in Japan . . . Oh and if only his site was in english so that you could arguably claim he is trying to infringe on your copyright . . . oh and if only you made something wearable instead of bitching about his amazing clothing.
0 -
I dont know how many of you have a Trader Joes food store by you (they are a US chain) but they had Dr. Bronners in both liquid and bar form at very reasonable prices!
0 -
you have a pm from me. Please respond
0 -
I will definitely be getting them shortened because at 5'5, the stacking is out of control. I am hoping these get softer and soon, cause they are one rough wear. The stiffest and most uncomfortable denim I have ever worn.
Is there a way to soften them that someone can recommend short of washing ? Cause man they are bulletproof.
0 -
Here are my first wear pics. The quality and lighting arent great given the iPhone's limitations. The Jeans are not nearly this blue in person. They are in reality alot darker.
0 -
Are these sandfordized? I havent soaked them but should I?
0 -
I guess "too much stacking" is subjective. Do you like alot, cause this dwarf has stacks that are about 5 inches high
0 -
Mine came today. I agree very stiff and mine werent shortened either, I got mad stacks cause I am only 5'5, and these are crazy long. I will update with fit pics when I can get them (soon I promise) but you have already seen what they look like laid out on the floor and comming out of the fed ex bag. I wont bore you all with that again.
0
Gilded Age/Uniqlo Collabs
in supermarket
Posted
Not gone, not forgotten . . . bump