denim_hwk

^ lol

Edited by denim_hwk on Feb 25, 2006 at 04:08 PM

h&m

Quote: There is no possible way to fuck things up as you'll always get jeans that reflect your lifestyle and habits, which is the point of raw denim.

yeah, but we all want our jeans to look good, right? as in get a good looking natural fade etc etc..

Quote: In other words to get more fading you should sacrifice the integrity of your testes and the lives of your future children by wearing ultra stiff, ballcrushingly tight jeans while falling off stairs.

LOL

Edited by denim_hwk on Feb 20, 2006 at 01:40 PM

great fit hap, nice clean style..

Quote:

Quote:

its not always as important what you wear, as how you wear it..

--- Original message by denim_hwk on Feb 17, 2006 01:47 PM

i feel like both witts and sabotoi are pulling them off. but i hate the tongue over the jeans thing. it's all about the ill cuff and no tongue.

--- Original message by werdtoyourmoms on Feb 17, 2006 04:24 PM

its not always as important what you wear, as how you wear it..

Quote: gotta give your hairy walnuts room to breathe.

word

Those Lee's don't have selvage ....

my dad wears the stuff

........

4 upper james street, soho..

edit: cue u beat me to it hehe

Edited by denim_hwk on Feb 9, 2006 at 09:57 AM

dude, didnt you know?

that pic was taken from last years annual Superfuture xmas partayyyy

IMO, the original german army sneaker is a very clean and stylish casual shoe. I agree that the hype surrounding the dior ripoff (and margiela, gucci, adidas reissues) is riduculous, but I still like the design of the shoe.

also, saying that a pair of jeans CANT be worn right with a pair of lowtops might be a bit harsh heh..

Quote:

You only want it because its cheap Dior/Margiela.

Try looking at some of the really nice old dunks, fx. Rebounds and PONYs.

--- Original message by skecr8r on Dec 20, 2005 09:24 AM

Quote:

posted by: skecr8r on Dec 20, 2005 09:24 AM

message: You only want it because its cheap Dior/Margiela.

Try looking at some of the really nice old dunks, fx. Rebounds and PONYs.

dress badly on purpose.

this is a joke, right?

this is brilliant!!

Edited by denim_hwk on Dec 10, 2005 at 09:14 PM

Quote: the deordorant ads suggesting oral sex.

heh yea maybe.. I read somewhere that the salt should help set the indigo and give better fade or something... I mean, jumping into the ocean is a well known technique (dont know what exact function this has though haha), maybe the salt i added to the washing powder replicated this ?? I really have no idea..

thanks man

I havent done anything extreme to them, not on purpose to get the fasing to speed up.. Just the regular spilling of beer and stuff like that. they got wet in the rain a few times, that might have helped the fade on the thighs a bit, i dunno..

they are a bit loose on me, I think thats why the honeycombs havent come out too strong, havent been starching them any either, and even before the first wash the denim was pretty soft so i was very happy that the fading came out this clear.

cheers..

yea, I removed it after a month or so, before any washing.. The stitching was a bit too flashy for my style, and i got kinda bored of it i think.. If you could take a close look on the fabric, you would see that theres no trace of the stitching at all, no holes, no dark spots, etc..

and about the tearing, i think its because the jeans got wet at the bottom when i put them on after showering hehe, and from the jeans touching the ground/rubbing against my shoes.. but actually i dont think it looks too bad, and it can easily be fixed

heres my 4-5 month old nudie RR's

washed two times

first at 40 degrees in machine (no tumble) with a cup of salt; just wanted to test the effect

second time at 60 in machine, no salt lol, and no tuble dry

front

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a286/hawk_wind/IMG_0144.jpg

back

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a286/hawk_wind/IMG_0145.jpg

been reading this forum for about a year but now i got myself a camera so i thought it was about time to contribute some!

Edited by denim_hwk on Dec 8, 2005 at 03:43 PM