cleanlines

Hoping someone can help me find the new folk virgils in black 9.5. Please message me if you can help. Cheers !

Let me know if you're selling , Cheers

For Sale : Visvim Virgil Folk Kngr US 10 Dark Brown 2011

 

Got these brand new a few weeks ago and have worn them twice but am sadly letting them go as they are too narrow for my wide feet.

Pretty much as new condition. Comes with FIL bag , box and original tags.

My camera is broken so all i can provide at the moment is the original auction page which shows pics of the actual boots i'm selling.

Looking for £625 delivered worldwide.

 

 

http://hk.f1.page.auctions.yahoo.com/hk/auction/b24152820?actsrch=srp3

I know sizing questions are frowned upon in here but i could do with a little help if possible. The only vis item i own apart from footwear is a deckhand which is tagged a size large but fits more like a medium. I generally wear a medium in most brands including Engineered garments and uniqlo. Now i'm looking at getting a couple of vis items but they are marked as number sizes 1/2/3/4. Based on my normal size being a medium what number size would that equate to in Vis ?

Looking for a proxy service from Hong Kong if anyone can help.

Are these small fitting ? Should i go up a size or ge my normal levi / nudie size ?

I dont understand why these are so popular. Dont get me wrong i understand the historical significance and the denim quality / constuction is superb. What gets me is the fit which just doesnt look that good on most people. Being a slim fit i think they only look good on taller and thinner people. Its only my opinion but i think the 1944 and 1955 fits are much better and more flattering on the majority on guys. Anyone agree with me on this ?

Quote:

dont buy from this scammer

--- Original message by guffer on Mar 8, 2006 05:59 AM

Not true have sold to people on this board in the past with no problems. Pictures can be provided and paypal accepted so the buyer is protected. Can also list through ebay if you prefer. Royal mail are investigating Guffer after he claimed i didnt send him an item which proof of purchase was provided for. So whos the scammer Guffer ?

New with all tags. Just looking to get back what i paid £110 + shipping.

Quote:

thanks for the help, theyre all def good ideas. Im really into the springcourts, i had never heard of that company before. Do any of you have them? Are they a good shoe?

--- Original message by smapty on Mar 5, 2006 03:30 PM

I have the spring courts in white. Top trainer for summer and very ccomfortable. I would also recommend a classic : stan smiths

Am i right in saying 11" and above is high rise and below 9" is low rise ?

I know the high rise low rise debate was done recently. Just wanted to know which body types do actually suit a low rise on blokes and which body types suit a high rise ?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6853762621&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1

Can someone who owns this jean give a description of fit or photos wearing it. How does it compare to the 1944 for instance ?

Do the Rescues shrink at all ?

Read my thread posted 2 days ago. All this years 47's and possibly 55's are 2 inches longer in the leg. So if you want a 36 leg then order a 34

http://superfuture.com/city/supertalk/index.cfm?page=topic&topicID=9024

Uk

This is definitely confirmed as i've had 2 shops measure all their stock and its the same on every single pair. Any ideas as to why levis have done this or is it just a big fuck up ?

I posted up a couple of weeks ago about how my new 1947 Lvc's had not shrunk in the leg length when soaked about 5 times. Well heres the thing : All the leg lengths this season, certainly on 47's and 55's, are 2 inches longer than tagged. So if you buy a 34/34 and expect them to be 32/32 after soaking they wont be. They will be 32/34 as the original leg length would be 36". Hope this makes sense.

Baggy and boxy

What do you guys prefer and what are the fors and againsts. Traditional as in Lvc or modern like Apc

I have a new pair rescues in a 32" waist and yes they are too big on the waist but fit nice through the leg. If i go down a size will they be much narrower through the leg ?

Theres not a huge amount of difference in any of them. Yes the 47's are slimmish but its all relative and they are by no means a skinny jean. The 44 is looser yes but seems to settle after a couple of days of wearing and is not what i call baggy. It's worth having all 3 imo : 1944 , 1947 and 1955. You wont need anything else either because The quality of LVC surpasses all the brands in my experience and once youve worn them you wont go back to anything else

have sent you a pm jiomitori

Think these are quite hard to get now and arent in the current range. Anyway they have been soaked for 15 minutes in cold water . They are unworn though as the fit isnt really what i wanted. If you want a loose (but not baggy) straight leg jean then these are perfect. looking for £100 + delivery

measurements : waist 16.5" , inseam 32" , rise 12" , leg opening 8.75"

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/3413/photo06414in.jpg

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/7637/photo06420ib.jpg

http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/962/photo06439zg.jpg

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/9252/photo06443dl.jpg

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/1285/photo06455wo.jpg