Jump to content

Amoskeag XX brand


beatle

Recommended Posts

Bumping this thread back to life..I was at the store a couple of weeks ago while in NYC...met mr. amoskeag himself....

3929701553_7d3d383c43.jpg

3929701519_1b0b46b68f.jpg

3929701463_7b1d0b60a8.jpg

Amazing denim - amazing details...I'm gonna post some more pics of the jeans soon

4018240373_e587e19b76.jpg

In the meantime - website is up and running - some rally cool items...

Check out the seamless tube jeans

http://amoskeagxx.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So this company is just using the name? I like the concept, but they really should work on the lighting for the pictures of their jeans. I can't really tell if I like them. They definitely have a bit of a different look to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are very knowlegable!

There is still no solid evidence whether Cone was exclusively using natural or synthetic indigo during the period in question, 1900 -1920. Certainly when Proximity started in 1896 it would have used natural indigo particularly because synthetic indigo did not become profitably commercially marketed and available until at least 1897. There is also the question of whether Cone would have used synthetic indigo during World War I. Was there a non-German source for synthesized indigo at this time?

AS you might know by now, Cone have been looking into this. It's possible that Cone might still have used synthetic indigo during WWI, despite lack f availability of th German product, via a Canadian supplier.

Beatle, does this new company have any connection at all with the old one, or are they just harnessing the association of a resonant name?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From their website it doesn't look like they have any connection to the old mills other than the name. Although, I have a penchant for being wrong these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AS you might know by now, Cone have been looking into this. It's possible that Cone might still have used synthetic indigo during WWI, despite lack f availability of th German product, via a Canadian supplier.

.

It's quite interesting, because both Germany and the UK (and, from 1917, the US) circumvented war-time trade embargoes on many commodities through Canada. Besides synthetic indigo passing from Germany to the US through Canada, nickel (then virtually unavailable in Europe) passed to Germany from Canadian smelters at a time when England was already at war. They seem boring, those Canadians, but they are not.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure there has to be some connection - or else I doubt they'd be using the name...

anyways - took some pics -

the denim itself is really interesting.

It has some slubyness - and it looks like almost 2 different dyeing processes have been used. some streaks seem to be almost purple verses the reg. indigo tone..

4031480016_e1f63d9d27.jpg

Button fly

4031479956_59989d535c.jpg

the back of the leg is made of sanforized denim - and the front is raw denim - supposed to prevent you from stepping on the leg

4031480252_83479b0501.jpg

Backpocket design

4031480072_8464e82009.jpg

4031479812_6334e5e9c6.jpg

construction detail

4031480154_9121c084c4.jpg

white selvage line

4031480104_354b84ced7.jpg

and the nicest detail - pocket bags...stained/ dyed

4030725211_cfcf1d7fae.jpg

4030725153_6326568bb1.jpg

4031479580_0f6f33663f.jpg

_____________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

There's an OK feautre in the NY times which features Amoskeag XX... story is bla, the pricetags are wtf, (especially when in the UK you can buy a lot of cool victorian stuff for zilch, I saw an amazing stereo viewer in mahogany this morning for £35) but the photos are great - they use the old tintype process:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/fashion/12CODES.html?_r=1

...& here's the diirect link for the Tintype slideshow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm at work so I haven't read the article, but any word on whether or not this brand has any connection to the old mills or is it just riding the coat tails?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They say they're "continuing the tradition" of the old Amoskeag XX, but give no detail about where, for instance, the denim comes from, so I suspect there's no connection bar featuring a few photos of the old mill on their website.

I would love to be wrong, and discover they've tracked down a few of the workers laid off in the 50s and fired up some old Drapers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They say they're "continuing the tradition" of the old Amoskeag XX, but give no detail about where, for instance, the denim comes from, so I suspect there's no connection bar featuring a few photos of the old mill on their website.

I would love to be wrong, and discover they've tracked down a few of the workers laid off in the 50s and fired up some old Drapers...

This is exactly it, there is absolutely no connection between the mill of many years ago and the brand of today.

Kenji, the designer/owner, is Japanese, all the denim is Japanese and fairly "forward" looking.

They're moving much of the production to America and they're going to start using Cone denim shortly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The seamless denim is apparently very difficult to weave (I can imagine why) and likely won't be remade. I heard they actually broke a loom making this yardage. Kenji is a mill fanatic through and through. In fact he has a new, more moderately priced jean called Mill Worker.

As I have long dreamed of producing a jean called Loomfixer (one of the highest paid and most respectable floor positions in the mills of old) I very much respect his work.

I can see the seamless denim is also a mill romantic's homage to the seamless bags woven on old shuttle looms. I am very happy he made it and wish Amoskeag XX much success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do they mean by "seamless?" Did I miss something? The denim looks very interesting and I would like to know what the difference in the denim is or mainly what the difference is in the manufacturing process. It would be nice to see them move their production over here and maybe revamp the "schmatta" business a bit and put Cone to work creating some interesting denim.

After looking over their website the front pleated engineer jeans look pretty cool. i wonder what they look like on, with the front pleats and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the jean has seams but it's made with denim that was woven as a narrow tube. So part of the leg is seamless tube. Here are some old pics: http://denimnews.blogspot.com/2008/07/amoskeag-xx-amoskeag-manufacturing.html

Doing this on a shuttle loom that normallly weaves denim requires some serious modifications (additional harnesses that may need to move independently). The easier way would be to get an old loom already configured to weave seamless (aka "pillow tubing") fabrics but that requires a hefty investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it's woven like some t-shirts are woven? Shit looks nice man. Still don't know if I like the fit. The fit on that dude doesn't look so good, but that shirt looks pretty nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tube tees are actually knit, not woven, on circular knitting machines which generally create cloth by looping yarns. Different yarn insertion method from shuttle weaving looms.

If anything tube denim is probably more similar to double faced fabric in principal.

So it's woven like some t-shirts are woven? Shit looks nice man. Still don't know if I like the fit. The fit on that dude doesn't look so good, but that shirt looks pretty nice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

seamless is unique to some, but..

seamless means no train-tracks and leg-twisting:(

This seamless denim is not sanforized...it will twist and shrink a lot.

don't remember how the upper side seams are constructed but if the raw edges are tightly overlocked and busted open and ironed down you'll still get some kind of train track.

What seamless does mean is no selvage edge even though its woven on selvage looms.

Paul- hope you are well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...