Medine

Warehouse

7,433 posts in this topic

On 8/15/2017 at 10:29 AM, Doogan said:

Received my pair of 1105s today in a 34 and the waist measures just under 16" measured across the top. WTF. This is a damn shame as everywhere else seems good. A 32" waist on size 34 jeans is a piss take imo.

 

Added a comparison of my 34 1101 vs new 34 1105.

20170815_183540.jpgDoogan, I have the 1101 in 33 and 34 and the 1105 in 34.  The 1105 does run a little smaller (more like the 1101 in 33) but I'm happy with all three pairs depending on the look and feel I'm in the mood for on a particular day.  The 1105 is a great fit with a slightly lower rise than the 1101.

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1105 is definitely tighter in the top block. I need to lose some weight and hopefully then they'll work out for me.

I'm getting married next year so have both that and the jeans as an incentive (jeans more so though). :D

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my first post in this forum, hello everybody! 

I would like to share some photos of my warehouse jeans collection, 1001xx-1000, 1001xx, 1101(current model in 2017) and gleem 201 as well! (Gleem a small japanese denim brand, with very similar frabic to the 1001xx)

Sorry for my poor English, hope you enjoy the photos :P

IMG_0700.JPG

8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1001xx-1000

one wash, short horn buffalo paper patch (With space between the words "Ware" and "House"), red tab with (R) and GENUS on both sides, 50's cut,
The most interesting part is that the belt loop is using another fabric

IMG_0701.JPG

IMG_0702.JPG

IMG_0703.JPG

IMG_0704.JPG

IMG_0705.JPG

IMG_0706.JPG

IMG_0707.JPG

11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1001xx

non wash, long horn buffalo leather patch, red tab without (R) and GENUS on 1 side only, 50's cut,
The hardware is very similar to 1001xx-1000

IMG_0708.JPG

IMG_0709.JPG

IMG_0710.JPG

IMG_0711.JPG

IMG_0712.JPG

10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1101 (Current model in 2017)

non wash, paper patch, no hidden riven of the back pockets.IMG_0713.thumb.JPG.e529aae16abdb3ce330e5af169b73ae1.JPGIMG_0714.thumb.JPG.8eeb076e36e137c45e058d65e9921bf2.JPGIMG_0717.thumb.JPG.01b8d253935af16038ccfcf56d17d1b2.JPG
IMG_0719.thumb.JPG.77097773923225c90f223e6f4d7cae96.JPGIMG_0720.thumb.JPG.efb39f16ba5026201d3515c2e4850908.JPGIMG_0716.JPG

this 1101 is an excellent replica jeans of 60's Levi's, as the watch pocket is sew with 90degree rotation, which can create a wrinkle on the watch pocket after shrinkage, and it is a feature I love for the 60's 501 (pic borrowed)59b942784804a_watchpocket.jpg.a092b7501fe4c1aef1af4e01524079ba.jpg
Another interesting feature of 1101 is that it has very big backpocket, you can see the photos comparing it with TFH 3001 W34 (while 1101 is W32 only), and the 1001xx-1000 as well

IMG_0724.thumb.JPG.e87ce07c44157a1a3dc83555c8593705.JPGIMG_0723.thumb.JPG.8c5e77fde0e516eee664fce48e1b0653.JPG

Edited by Jeff_ffej
10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gleem 201

50's cut and tapper on the leg, very special cutting, TFH-like arcuate and red tab, this jeans has very similar fabric to the 1001xx!

IMG_0725.JPG

IMG_0727.JPG

IMG_0735.JPG

IMG_0729.JPG

IMG_0730.JPG

IMG_0731.JPG

IMG_0736.JPG

14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparison of red lines of the 4 jeans, from top to bottom (1001xx-1000 -> 1001xx -> 1101 -> gleem 201)

 

IMG_0732.JPG

13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome Jeff, that's an excellent introduction and some great pairs there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those gleems look really cool... never heard of them before. Couldn't find much about it here on sufu. I wonder if anyone has some faded pairs? 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Maynard Friedman said:

Welcome Jeff, that's an excellent introduction and some great pairs there.

hi there :)

I really like the 1101, and I guess I will start wearing it soon!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My two Warehouse chambray shirts. Both size 40 in short and long sleeve. The short sleeve I've had for more than a year but only worn in spring and summer. The long sleeve is a recent purchase directly from WH's online store (ordering was a breeze).

 

IMG_20170914_123948.jpg

IMG_20170914_124008.jpg

IMG_20170914_124025.jpg

IMG_20170914_124220.jpg

IMG_20170914_124248.jpg

IMG_20170914_124341.jpg

IMG_20170914_124427.jpg

IMG_20170914_124453.jpg

IMG_20170914_124525.jpg

12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been on the hunt for a pair of Warehouse 800s (on the cheaper side) for some time and, yesterday, found a pair for $130 on Grailed.

I'm presently working on a pair of size 33 TFH 3009s. They're beautiful pair of jeans in every way but my gripe is that the seat and waist (when shrunk are ~31" and stretched to 32") are looser than I'd like after stretching out with some wear.

On the other hand, I have a pair of size 31 SC Okinawas that I've worn in a few years ago that fit tighter in the top block. The waist stretched out to ~31" and the seat/rise feel comfortable. I think the "tapered" seat/waist and higher rise makes it more comfortable.

In essence, what kind of seat do the 800s have? Does it have a slight taper like the SCs? What kind of stretch should I experience as well? I've heard that they can go to raw with some effort. Just for reference, I'm 5'11" and ~155 lbs with a slim/average build. I usually go for a 31 in most brands.

Edited by ReverendGlasseye
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I find the back of the 800 quite baggy/saggy due to the long rise. Especially the TFH 3009 is much more fitted. That said I have the 800 in size 34 and the 3009 in 36. The 3009 is a better looking fit from the rear.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@beautiful_FrEaK Alright thanks for the advice. The rear of my 3009s are a bit saggy but it's more to blame on the present over sized fit than anything. IIRC, you went true to size correct? I've seen people here go one down (to account for stretch) or TTS depending on what they're looking for.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/17/2017 at 9:03 AM, beautiful_FrEaK said:

Personally, I find the back of the 800 quite baggy/saggy due to the long rise.

Do you pull the jeans all the way up?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ReverendGlasseye I wear the 3009 in size 36 and the WH800 in 34. My true waist is around 34.5 -35". The 800 is a bit over tag size raw and thus stretches back out quite easily.

 

@Sensuki I don't pull them up all the way and they sag a little bit and get lower while I wear them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@beautiful_FrEaK Yeah, because IME the Warehouse 800 back rise isn't that high. at least for what would be my size. I pretty much won't buy anything with a back rise under 15" (prefer 16-17" but super hard to find outside of custom denim) and I take a 32" waist and the 800 comes in at ~14" there, I think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it isn't extremely high, I agree with you. My preferred rise is at 15.5" on a waist of 35". Maybe it has something to do how the the top block is assembled together with the thighs?
I mainly put it here because the @ReverendGlasseye asked for a comparison with the 3009 and since he thought his pair of 3009 is loose in the seat I just wanted to tell him my observation where I find the 800 to be much looser :)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Sensuki Here are the measurements for my tag 32 800s after a full hot wash and machine dry. I haven't worn them at all so I suspect they'll stretch out a bit with some wear

Waist: 15.75"
Front rise: 11.25"
Rear rise: 15.25"
Thigh: 12.125"
Knee: 8.75"
Leg opening: 8"
Inseam: 34.25"
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By UkeNo


      View Advert Burgus Plus x Warhouse lot.880 W34 L34
      For Sale:
      Burgus Plus x Warehouse Jeans - Lot.880 straight fit with taper. Size W34 L34
      Measurements: (BIG style)
      Waist: 35" Front Rise: 11" Back Rise: 15.75" Inseam: 30 " Thigh: 12" Knee: 9" Hem: 7.5"   Very little wear, came one washed - i've washed once again, and hemmed on Union Special.   Please see pictures for details.   Price: £100 + Your choice of shipping via: PayPal as Gift or +4%    Please send any questions to PM or michaelbrownmr@gmail.com   Thanks. Advertiser UkeNo Date 08/21/2017 Price $135.00 Category denim  
    • By UkeNo
      For Sale:
      Burgus Plus x Warehouse Jeans - Lot.880 regular fit with taper. Size W34 L34
      Measurements: (BIG style)
      Waist: 35" Front Rise: 11" Back Rise: 15.75" Inseam: 30 " Thigh: 12" Knee: 9" Hem: 7.5"   Very little wear, came one washed - i've washed once again, and hemmed on Union Special.   Please see pictures for details.   Price: £100 + Your choice of shipping via: PayPal as Gift or +4%    Please send any questions to PM or michaelbrownmr@gmail.com   Thanks.
    • By fix_me


      View Advert Warehouse DD-1001XX Size 34
      Warehouse Duck Digger 1001XX in size 34. 
      One wash. Worn once. Just a touch too big for me. Hot soaked once more to try to see if they would shrink more. They didn't. Arcs removed to Levi spec. Great looking and feeling pair of jeans. I'm buying a new pair in 33, so the 34 has gotta go. 17" across waist
      12" rise
      16" rear
      12.25" thigh
      32.25" inseam
      44" overall length
      9" leg opening
      Looking to recoup my costs, less a little bit. $215usd shipped in the US/Canada.




      Advertiser fix_me Date 05/15/2017 Price $215.00 Category denim  
    • By fix_me
      Warehouse Duck Digger 1001XX in size 34. 
      One wash. Worn once. Just a touch too big for me. Hot soaked once more to try to see if they would shrink more. They didn't. Arcs removed to Levi spec. Great looking and feeling pair of jeans. I'm buying a new pair in 33, so the 34 has gotta go. 17" across waist
      12" rise
      16" rear
      12.25" thigh
      32.25" inseam
      44" overall length
      9" leg opening
      Looking to recoup my costs, less a little bit. $215usd shipped in the US/Canada.




    • By STropio


      View Advert WAREHOUSE 1001XX SZ. 29
      Unworn and soaked/one wash

      Measurements in inches:

      Waist 28
      Thigh 11
      Leg opening 8
      Inseam 27.5



      Advertiser STropio Date 05/05/2017 Price $125.00 Category denim