Warehouse

[Iron Horse 4,056]

I like your IH bandana Max, it's a near-exact repro of the '70s Wrangler one I also carry in my back pocket. 

[Sugar Mountain 193,820]

The jeans aren't looking too shabby either. Kudos.

[beautiful_FrEaK 1,664,776]

Great update Flo!

[guthriegking 652]

Max those just keep looking better and better!

[Rightyow77 1,148]

Damn these WH vulcanized shoes run huge! Grabbed a size 7 and they look like clown shoes :/ sucks really like them otherwise.

 

Can I get an opinion, about quarter inch of material in the toe box. 

Edited February 25, 2016 by Rightyow77

[Jeef1 25]

Size 7 can look like clown shoes? Try having size 13 shoes! They look fine. A quater inch of extra space is not really an excessive amount... You don't want your toes to touch the end of the shoes, right? Do the shoes flop around when you walk? But really, the only person that can tell you if your shoes fit you is yourself.

[Flash 245,304]

I got a 7 in these as well ( my vans / converse size is an 8 ) but was able to try them on in the store , it is definitely best to go down 1 size in these ,

[Rightyow77 1,148]

They don't make a size 6 otherwise I would have gotten those. Oh well I may have to let them go on the market.

[Geeman 2,009]

I got 8 but wish I'd got 7....

[Rightyow77 1,148]

sold

Edited February 27, 2016 by Rightyow77

[Rightyow77 1,148]

Managed to snag a pair of sweats 

 

digging it might grab a few more.

 

I wear a medium in Buzz SG and Whites

 

This is a size 38

 

[goodrain 860]

looks good! hopefully it won't shrink too much

Edited February 27, 2016 by goodrain

[guthriegking 652]

Great fit on that dude! Might need to pick up one of those soon, looks real nice.

[Sugar Mountain 193,820]

Paging Setterman to get images of his 1001 up on here and not just IG!

[Blue Nemo 1,058]

i am wearing a US 10 to 11 in sneakers such as these, don't get me started on clown shoes....

which is also the reason why i wear regular/relaxed straight cuts btw...

 

i think they look a-okay

Edited February 27, 2016 by Blue Nemo

[setterman 912,216]

Sugar mountain, gonna try and get some fit pics taken tomorrow.

[setterman 912,216]

Warehouse 1001.  226 days of wear, 26 days since their last wash.  Fit picture from the side is closest to true color, except for the extra bright white spot mid thigh.  In the fit picture from the front, the right pocket isn't that contrasty in real life.  Even though I was standing in the shade, that side was closer to the sun and turned out brighter. 

 

I don't know why photo bucket is fucking rotating photos after I've adjusted them before uploading, and then after I've adjusted them again online.  If they don't straighten out, I'll try adjusting them later.  

 

 

 

 

Edited February 29, 2016 by setterman

[Maynard Friedman 565,202]

They look great setterman, what does the hem measure?

[setterman 912,216]

31.25" to 31.5". These are a 36x32, and that's where the factory hem shrunk to (just over 3" of inseam loss).

[Maynard Friedman 565,202]

I meant hem rather than inseam.

[setterman 912,216]

Sorry, leg opening is a little over 8.5".

[setterman 912,216]

The dark line across the left rear pocket is loom chatter.  Shows up on a smaller scale in various places across the jeans, more so than any other pair of jeans I've owned.  

[goodrain 860]

got the warehouse sneakers from RightyNow. Crazy comfortable and spongy, even more so than the Lofgren Sneakers. Unfortunately the 7's felt more like a 7.5 to me, and not an 8, which is what I need. If anyone else wants to give them a shot, hit me up!

[d-rew12 17,904]

Hey setterman! Those look great, and fit great! I hate to ask but do you happen to have waist, thigh measurements and maybe front and rear rise? I'm also a 36, and the 800's didn't work for me, but those look seriously fantastic! So am now very interested!

[setterman 912,216]

I'll get them for you this evening.  In the mean time, the measurements on WH's website are for the one wash version, and are very close to where mine are at.  

 

http://www.ware-house.co.jp/?pid=65718435

 

What was the problem with the 800? The 1001 will have a little less rise, a little wider thighs (and maybe a little more room in the seat), and a little more taper.  I'd wear a 36 in both models.     

[d-rew12 17,904]

I'll get them for you this evening.  In the mean time, the measurements on WH's website are for the one wash version, and are very close to where mine are at.  

 

http://www.ware-house.co.jp/?pid=65718435

 

What was the problem with the 800? The 1001 will have a little less rise, a little wider thighs (and maybe a little more room in the seat), and a little more taper.  I'd wear a 36 in both models.     

Probably should have checked their first, but thanks for the link!

 

My problems with the 800's were the thighs were too tight, and waist was a bit snug. I know they would have stretched some but didn't feel the thighs would stretch enough to be comfortable. While not super happy on less rise (although according to the site the rises are still good just wish there was a bit more rear rise), everything else sounds perfect. 

 

After looking at the measurements of the 1001, I'm not really sure why I went with the 800 over the 1001. The thigh seems a little bit big, but should still work. Maybe I was scared the thighs were too big. 

[setterman 912,216]

There shouldn't be more than 1/4" difference in the thighs between the 800 and 1001. The 1001 should be a little more rounded in the top block though, and that might help some. You should take a look at the 1000. It should be 1/2" bigger in the thigh vs the 800, and that will be a noticable difference.

[setterman 912,216]

These are almost 30 days out from their last wash, so they're stretched out.

WH 1001 36x32

Waist 38"

Front rise 11.9"

Rear rise 17.25"

Thigh 13.5"

Post wash waist will be closer to 35.5" and thigh 13.25"

[d-rew12 17,904]

There shouldn't be more than 1/4" difference in the thighs between the 800 and 1001. The 1001 should be a little more rounded in the top block though, and that might help some. You should take a look at the 1000. It should be 1/2" bigger in the thigh vs the 800, and that will be a noticable difference.

 

These are almost 30 days out from their last wash, so they're stretched out.

WH 1001 36x32

Waist 38"

Front rise 11.9"

Rear rise 17.25"

Thigh 13.5"

Post wash waist will be closer to 35.5" and thigh 13.25"

 Those measurements are absolutely perfect. Pretty much spot on for what I'm looking for!

 

The thighs on my 800's was between 12.5-12.75 which was just too small and unsure if they would have stretch past 13. I can do 13.25 and 13.5 is even better. Also for the 1000's the leg opening seems a little too wide for me.

 

But appreciate the help! Definitely going to try and grab a pair of the 1001 when I visit Japan in April.

[Bobbo 6,652]

Too small (and probably too pricey at the end too) for me but I thought I'd post the link to this deadstock type 3. Is this their first patch design or did they do another one prior to this one?

 

http://page5.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/e180330257