Jump to content

Levi's 501 - a visual guide


Paul T

Recommended Posts

Good question. I believe the later year models use polycore but I'm not certain about the early ones, I shall ask when I have a chance.

Edit: I did ask. All US LVC are polycore. They go to great lengths to get the right colour, but I think they made a decision on cost and wear grounds. I do think this is a shame as one some models, for instance th 40s and 50s jeans, how the Polycore fades is a big part of the look.

I've updated the dimensions for 2009 produciton,.

1927, 1944, 1955, 1978 and 1983 are all very oversize. This is really irritating and there is no good rationale for it; there's no reason you would want 78 or 83 jeans to be hugely baggy, for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I just bagged some 1966 for £90 which are the 2009 (the button has 233M stamped on it).

Thing is, I got the same size as I have in 1947 501 (nothing stamped on the back of the 47's button) - the 47's I shrank to fit from a 34 x 32 (I'm actually a 33 x 30). The 47's are the same size post-bath shrink and worn about 20 times (warm, 1 hour, left on to dry before being hung for a day) as the unshrunk 66's. Waist smaller than post soak 47's (actual measurements are 18" wide for 47's and 17.5" for the 66's) and the same length (31").

So beware out there, seems they've changed them and sizing down will be the death of you!

I can't decide whether to send back the 66's or just do a cold short starch removing soak followed by a load of squats to keep the waist bearable (in the hope 5-6 months of wear will see them stretch out pending that first cold wash/dry)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the 1966 cut was quite slimmer than the 1947, so I'm sure they are reproduced correctly, LVC usually are very precise about this.

My advice would be: keep them and wear them tight in the waist, that was the 60's look anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Havent posted in a while , thought it appropriate to post tese beauties which appeared on Marvins today .

http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.marvins-jp.com/&ei=9MyLSsDxM5zLjAfo0IXlCw&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DMARVINS%2BJP%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26rlz%3D1R2ADBS_enGB341

Link not copying properly - go to WHATS NEW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Havent posted in a while , thought it appropriate to post tese beauties which appeared on Marvins today .

http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.marvins-jp.com/&ei=9MyLSsDxM5zLjAfo0IXlCw&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DMARVINS%2BJP%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26rlz%3D1R2ADBS_enGB341

Link not copying properly - go to WHATS NEW

I haven't gone on this site for ages. Love the early 1920's 501's. Go to 'denim pants', first couple of pairs of '1922 501xx's' are early ones, as they have the plain fly buttons. Great to see that.

Lvc take note!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just doing a catch up here. The 47's I have are a bit too tight in the waist (post Xmas blowout!).

Just for kicks I did a ten minute tepid soak whilst wearing the 66's.

They have come out perfect. I stretched whilst wet and sat in them until almost dry (air dried indoors). The waist is looser than the 47's - odd as it was tight to start (as in they appear to have stretched a bit!). The thigh is definitely far looser than the 47's which are of course last season's.

Of course I did an hour soak with the 47's and ten minutes on the 66's but they feel similar post soak & dry. These 66's are superb. Loving them. They are quite different denim-wise to my 47's which are a bit more 'fluffy' than these.

21541_258540671960_580251960_3722599_2152208_n.jpg

4258656739_f23157f71e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just doing a catch up here. The 47's I have are a bit too tight in the waist (post Xmas blowout!).

Just for kicks I did a ten minute tepid soak whilst wearing the 66's.

They have come out perfect. I stretched whilst wet and sat in them until almost dry (air dried indoors). The waist is looser than the 47's - odd as it was tight to start (as in they appear to have stretched a bit!). The thigh is definitely far looser than the 47's which are of course last season's.

Of course I did an hour soak with the 47's and ten minutes on the 66's but they feel similar post soak & dry. These 66's are superb. Loving them. They are quite different denim-wise to my 47's which are a bit more 'fluffy' than these.

.

.

These look like they are gonna fit real nice. Curious what they will be when dry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll post a fit pic. I re-wet the legs yesterday and stretched them a touch as they were the right length with no cuff and I sometimes like one small turn up.

Tried the 47's on again - they are like spray on. I was hoping to be able to judge the difference between 66 and 47 but the only conclusion is that you can't do that unless you get the 47 and 66 from the same season I guess it's not like for like (ie Levis seem to have sized up a bit this season - making buying the LVC a bit of an unknown).

One thing I would say is that the legs went up about 2" with a short "jeans on" soak but the waist - even if very tight when totally raw - doesn't shift more than you'd want if they are on you when they are wet and when they dry. If I'd have gone to a 36 x 34 (my only other option) I think they'd be loose and very anti-fit. Not what I believe is a "60's" look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't you wait untl I've decided??? You gonna do a Fardin on me? Downsize by two inches in the main,

TO be clear, on the 55, with old stock, which are made right, buy em acutal size. I take 32, I wear 32. The cut is wide enough that this works perfectly, not too baggy. The current range are THREE INCHES OVERSIZED! SO I would go one below, ie is you're 32 wasit, buy a 30, it will measure 33, shirnk to 31, stretch to 32. Best still, email them to check acxtual measurements!

My apologies for LVC crapness. The jeans are good, will take longer to wear in than those Sammies....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm yeah got it... so i already ordered a 34 which is my size how do i know if theyre old or new im assuming theyre old cause theyre on sale eh?

for lee's ill get a 32 right? cause these dont shrink? how come they same theyll shrink 5%???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Paul

If i have to make choice of buying either LVC 1955 , LVC 1947 , which one I should go , My size 34"/31". I already have LVC 501 1966 , 1978, 1983 and LVC 505 1967 .. All LVC 501 are 34"/34" except LVC 505 which is 34"/32". Please specify which size should I go for LVC 1955 and LVC 1947.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go 47. Mine (2008/2009) are much tighter post shrink than the 66 (2009/2010) despite both starting out as 34" x 32". My 66 shrank a little shorter than I wanted so I re-wet the legs and stretched them back out another 1/2" - 1".

The colder the bath you sit in the less they'll shrink - pull the leg length whilst damp to keep them short - stay longer in warmer water to get them lose more length (and go tighter).

For the record both mine fitted in the waist raw before sitting in the bath - ie I didn't size up 2" at all in the waist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

HAZARD - I sized actual size. Usually a 34" bought a 34". They fitted raw, warm soaked them to bring the legs up to be just on the shoe (small cuff for that Mod look). They can't shrink smaller than you if you keep them on whilst they dry!

I've always been nervous of sizing up as I don't wear belts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAZARD - I sized actual size. Usually a 34" bought a 34". They fitted raw, warm soaked them to bring the legs up to be just on the shoe (small cuff for that Mod look). They can't shrink smaller than you if you keep them on whilst they dry!

I've always been nervous of sizing up as I don't wear belts.

ohh they said that a size 34' will measure a 34' so i was assuming they'd shrink to a waist of 32 after hotsoak. I wasnt planning to wear them while they dry or maybe i should, i was planning to get 90-100% of the shrinking done before wearing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I sat in warm bath, they shrank at least 1.5" possibly 2". You can pull them longer whilst wet if the legs go too short for you.

I wore mine until almost dry and also did a few stretches in them. The only down side was the knees have gone a bit baggy from the bending.

I wouldn't risk soaking and drying without having them on IF you buy to fit when raw / unsoaked / washed.

I dropped a pint of Guinness on mine so have quickly soaked (read laid them unworn in a cold bath and then removed and hung to drip dry) once but they still fit nice after a few months of daily (sedate nothing too hectic) wear. I expect they will shrink again when warm washed and can't currently decide if that should be in the washing machine at a 30 degrees gentle wool cycle or another dip in the bath.

I love my '66's far more than my '47's as the '47's feel a bit too skinny in the leg (they are two seasons ago when I think the sizing wasn't as roomy as they appear to be made now) and will buy more if they hit sales (at £170+ I'm not in the game!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Thanks a lot for the guide, very helpful! I bought a pair of LVC 501XX from my friend some time ago, I'm trying to figure out what year, it looks like it's 27 or 33. Will try to get a new pair, since these are among the few jeans I've had that are wide enough in the thighs for me to keep a long time. Even Sugar Cane 1947s ripped after about nine-ten months. So could anyone please identify these?

jV2cAs.jpg?1s1h5Vs.jpg?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...