Jump to content

Shoes that look better with age...


kiya

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, givemefive said:

I think roughout is for me but I'm not totally sold because I know they will turn indigo blue!

900x900px-LL-70273848_img57635402.jpeg

My roughout Whites didn't get much Indigo Transfer, a bit wore off and the rest could be easily removed by gently brushing them while they were wet. The leather is very durable and sturdy, however my distresssed rough out had some spots that looked "bald". Nothing serious, but I was expecting a nicer finish. Would still recommend it after nearly 2 years of almost daily use.

Edited by Max Power
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Max Power said:

My roughout Whites didn't get much Indigo Transfer, a bit wore off and the rest could be easily removed by gently brushing them while they were wet. The leather is very durable and sturdy, however my distresssed rough out had some spots that looked "bald". Nothing serious, but I was expecting a nicer finish. Would still recommend it after nearly 2 years of almost daily use.

I like the distressed color, but probably don't want them that worn down.  Maybe I'd do the brown oil roughout then.  Maybe with a smooth brown oil shaft?  Not totally comfortable on mixing leathers yet stylewise but could have some good utility and allay my indigo transfer fears.  Not usually a big indigo transfer weeny but I've not worn $500 boots either. 

 

brown roughtout:

brown-roughout.jpeg

distressed roughout and distressed smooth shaft:

combo.jpg

 

roughout-indigo.jpg

Edited by givemefive
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mlwdp said:

Are you going with a Smokejumper?

Either Smokejumper or Bounty Hunter, only difference is the last.  I have a 10.5D off-the-rack makeup coming in the smokejumper to try on. I think I will need a C width. I will figure out if the 55/SD/BH last makes sense at that time.  originally I wanted the BH last but if I can't try it on it may make it too complicated for me to dial-in.

 

My brannock is an 11B, I wear an 11B in Alden Barrie with dress socks.  This leads me to believe I may want a 10.5C or 11C in the Whites for boot socks. Kyle looked at my trace and said 10C but I think that will be too small. I must have messed up the trace. I will try again after I try these 10.5D.

Edited by givemefive
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a 10.5D Smokejumper to try on.

I made a red arrow where its a little tight. In the blue area I definitely have a little space 

The ball of my foot may be a little forward of the widest part of the inside of the boot.  The heel feels ok, but the instep may be a little tight, that may be just the arch-ease.. 

228fdb1c_tight.jpeg

This is how much room I have in the toe:

b7660385_toe.jpeg

Boots look good! 
0b83a0ba_over.jpeg


I asked about an 11C Brandon from Baker's said:

You want about a thumb’s width from the end of the boot to your big toe. You would be looking at about 1/8” difference in length between an 11 and a 10.5. The width between a 10.5D and 11C is nearly identical. An 11C is going to be 1/8” narrower in the ball however will be 1/8” bigger in the instep and heel.


Some other opinions would be appreciated.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/01/2017 at 9:26 AM, mikecch said:

Tricker's monkey boots in Haas calf leather :)

Review here.

 

I like your review Mikkech, I haven't worn mine yet.

Tricker's will be releasing their first ever monkey boot range soon I think. But I am most excited for their winter 2017 range, which will have shearling lined boots!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2017 at 11:13 AM, kbuzz said:

Well I went with uk8. The fit perfect first day around the house.  Felt a bit snug the second.  Fingers cross they stretch a tad

Well I wore the trickers stow 8s around the house for a few hours and then ordered an 8.5 to compare.   The 8.5 is mo' better.   So I'm going to put them up for sale.  If anyone wants a U.K. 8 pair at a discount for my mistake let me know 

trickers Stow acorn

special make up for Division road Seattle which means:

commando sole

natural welt stitching 

two tone laces. 

New $525 plus shipping=$540

I'm thinking 475 shipped in the USA 

Thanks tough to take a

hit on these but you live n learn 

IMG_2981.JPG

Edited by kbuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2017 at 6:49 PM, BrownMetallic said:

VIBERG Black Pit Tanned Bison on 1035 last:

'Decided got too much natural trims in my boot stable, so DIYstained w/indigo colored dye. We'll see how they evo ...

Before:
97A89DA9-7B78-48FC-825F-5AEC169581C5.jpg

@BrownMetallic - That's a beautiful pair of Viberg's. Honestly, tho, I like the color before. Some buffalo leathers I've seen have too much heavy grain, but this leather has just enough to be interesting and unique without being too over-the-top. The more pairs like this I see around here, the more I'm warming up to Viberg. I really like the look of this last and toe shape, as I prefer boots with a wide forefoot and round toe. Where did you get them? Thnx mpp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^They're on the 1035 last__ from 2016NYCsamplesale.

'Got 2 Viberg Bisons w/ distinctly different texture.  I'm guessing, depends on w/c part of the hide & tanning process involved.  

These particular pair, leather is not dyed through ... prolly why they're  dark-brownish w/purplish hue when under direct sunlight.  As per GusFerguson__ tanning process was the same as on their famed ShellCordovan.

Edited by BrownMetallic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/29/2017 at 11:43 AM, BrownMetallic said:

^They're on the 1035 last__ from 2016NYCsamplesale.

'Got 2 Viberg Bisons w/ distinctly different texture.  I'm guessing, depends on w/c part of the hide & tanning process involved.  

These particular pair, leather is not dyed through ... prolly why they're  dark-brownish w/purplish hue when under direct sunlight.  As per GusFerguson__ tanning process was the same as on their famed ShellCordovan.

 

I spend way too long trying to figure out what the heck "w/c" stands for every time you type it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are your thoughts on speedhooks vs. all eyelets for the ever common 6-8" boots (e.g. Vibergs, Trumans, Aldens, Whites, etc.)?

It seems the all eyelets configuration is taking over. I get the aesthetic appeal of eyelets, and they're more practical if worn with dress pants (which can snag on speedhooks).

However, for regular wear with jeans, speedhooks make life so much easier. With eyelets, I constantly have to loosen my laces to the point where they unthread from the top eyelets, to get enough slack to put them on/take them off. I'm always the jackass who takes twice as long getting in/out of the door, and then my hipster friends start talking shit to me in their Blundstones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speed hooks are convenient, but I recently stopped liking them for several reasons: all eyelets looks cleaner; hooks hang up on inside of hem when taking boots off; hooks break laces quicker if not used properly; hooks can cause picking at hem. I have White SJ's and never understood why they have 3 sets of hooks and eyelet at the top. Hooks have to have constant pressure on the laces, otherwise the laces come out. With eyelets on top, the laces come out of the top hooks when threading the top eyelets. Too fussy for me. 

 

FWIW, I also don't care for eyelets spaced too closely together. Alden's have too many eyelets, spaced too close together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, oomslokop said:

i've always loved @BrownMetallic's idiosyncratic writing. i've always wondered what you do in real life, your language sounds at once as if it's almost computer-generated but also poetic.

Thanx, I think ?!?! :)

'Paltry english language skill was acquired academically from primary through tertiary education [in Manila] ... w/c, basically, meant I'm ESL, hence the [quirky] writing style ;);) 

Edited by BrownMetallic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mpukas said:

Speed hooks are convenient, but I recently stopped liking them for several reasons: all eyelets looks cleaner; hooks hang up on inside of hem when taking boots off; hooks break laces quicker if not used properly; hooks can cause picking at hem. I have White SJ's and never understood why they have 3 sets of hooks and eyelet at the top. Hooks have to have constant pressure on the laces, otherwise the laces come out. With eyelets on top, the laces come out of the top hooks when threading the top eyelets. Too fussy for me. 

 

FWIW, I also don't care for eyelets spaced too closely together. Alden's have too many eyelets, spaced too close together. 

I never take my laces out of the eyelets when I take them off. So when I'm going through the top hook, I hold it tight in the hook with one hand and can just tighten the rest with the other hand. No fuss with threading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • sufu1 changed the title to Shoes that look better with age...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...