Jump to content

Duke Mantee

member
  • Posts

    3563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    193

Posts posted by Duke Mantee

  1. My war denim was non-wash … which shrank to size and stayed there after more washing. All one-wash FW I have had never shrank noticeably with repeated washes, the usual ‘tightening’ and stiffness from freshly laundered denim aside.

    I doubt very much there would be significant variation.

  2. On 4/19/2024 at 10:17 PM, Maynard Friedman said:

    The rep system…

    Most people, if using the rep system, give a standard, green, positive rep symbol to a post they like. If they really like a post they’ll give it the yellow super-rep one and if they don’t like a post (I assume they must really dislike something as it’s not used often) they give it the red, negative rep. I understand all of this, it’s completely logical.

    What I don’t understand (and I’m not criticizing it), is why (and therefore when) do people use the blue rep icon? I assume it’s because they like a post, but not quite enough to give it a positive rep. Is it a neutral acknowledgment of a post that’s interesting or informative in some way? Please, blue rep users, explain your justification to me and satisfy my curiosity! 😁

    I wonder if anyone will give me a blue rep as a response…

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    I like the rep system - very often I’ll use the green, regularly the yellow (gold?) and infrequently the red; but I almost never use the blue because I’m not sure what it represents so in many cases rather than liking or disliking a post a ‘blue’ post will more likely drive me to comment. 

    Unfortunately comments can be misinterpreted … I suppose a bit like a blue rep

  3. Honey I shrunk the fanny pack

    About 2/3 of the version above - Walpier Buttero and Walpier Box leathers, AustriAlpin ‘Cobra’ hardware, Japanese twill lining and a drawstring bag with the remnants of the fabric

    IMG_4244.jpeg

    IMG_4245.jpeg

    IMG_4246.jpeg

  4. 1 hour ago, lee porter said:

    What’s the fit / year of this one please duke

    These are ancient mate - the tag says they could be 2002 (although the same number was used right up to 2009) but effectively you’re delving into the genesis of Bootleggers after the Toys McCoys departure 

    They are somewhere between the 47s and 51s in fit 

  5. I’m actually surprised there’s no interest (so far) in the Steamrollers and USN Work Trousers. The Steamrollers are brilliantly made and the USN trews are one of the best repros I’ve seen. Both from when FW really focused on making the factories work for their money

  6. 26 minutes ago, Maynard Friedman said:

    You should have chosen an appropriately sized animal to skin

    I did what I could with the remnants from the mammoth skin after I made my thong (even though the trunk was too short)

×
×
  • Create New...