Jump to content

fix_me

member
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by fix_me

  1. 54 minutes ago, Graytrain said:

    Crazy amount of wear @fix_me. Looks like you found them in a mine somewhere. 

    These quickly became my “work pants”. I have worn these for all labour around the house (a full gutting/rebuild of a 1913 home), plus they withstood a half-year stint as a residential flooring installer. They’ve received a lot of abuse.

  2. 2 hours ago, radfad2000 said:

    Just picked up a pair of the 1949hxx sz 33 warehouse cut. Sadly they dont work for me. Basically, a 1947 cut warehouse banner denim with some hinoya details. Shrunk: tub with hot water and dryer. Shrink is out. Looking to sell. $200us

    Messaged you

  3. On 11/8/2018 at 4:02 PM, 501XX4EVER said:

    They look like a great find and purchase as they seem to be in really excellent/one wash condition. It's very hard to find jeans on Buyee that don't have inseams that have been altered to roughly somewhere in the 70-75cm range. I have a pair very similar to those 47's, except mine are made in Japan. They really do shrink though, mine went well below tag size. I agree with you on the details though, the patch on mine will definitely turn "Jerky" with time, it's already a bit crispy bacon on the edges, it looks to be made from a completely different type of leather than L.V.C. use. I also love the stitching on the top of the pocket where then orange thread goes around the the bartacking, as seen in the picture above, it's the kinda thing that Warehouse does, pointless but beautiful. I also have a pair of super rare 1971 model 501's that are made in Japan which are also amazing. Of course, all Levi's heads will know the significance of 1971 for the 501.:D:D:D

    Yeah, these came in what looked to be almost unworn condition. Definitely washed at a point. I'm kinda scared what will happen when it comes time for me to wash them though. They're tagged 34x36.. They fit closer 32x30. They're definitely shorter than the auction stated (77cm VS 79.5cm). The hem looks original- or it was at least matched very well if they were shortened. I definitely would have preferred the extra 2.5cm of length. I don't mind my jeans fitting a bit short, but I normally throw my jeans in the dryer, and I don't wanna end up with a 28" inseam afterwards. Ah well, overall I'm pretty happy with them. A good pair of US made 47's is becoming harder to track down at a reasonable price- especially since Cone announced the shut down.

  4. Who knows more about the early LVC issues from Japan? Picked up a pair for a good price off Buyee. The denim looks and feels like Cone, and the tag does say Made in USA.. but the details on the jeans seem more "accurate" than what LVC has been producing through the 00's. Notably the patch. This leather is gonna get all brown and cool looking. 

    Are they cone? If not, where was this denim sourced from? 

    V5HrxaR.jpg

    0N36f3u.jpg

    v0WYXU0.jpg

    zrSwAvq.jpg

    BbmJEgS.jpg

    TBW6DLF.jpg

    mZTGiiE.jpg

    cr7hxhm.jpg

  5. Selling a pair of basically new TCB 50’s denim. Size 34. Purchased, hot washed twice to remove all shrink, worn once. Custom Levi style arcs added to the pockets. Great pair of pants, just not the right cut for me.

    Approx measurements

    16 3/4” Waist (aligned)

    12” Rise 

    15 3/4” Back Rise

    12 1/2” Thigh

    33” Inseam

    9” Leg Opening

    44” Overall Length

    Asking $160 shipped within the US/Canada. Willing to consider trades for other denim with a similar waist size.

    More pictures on Grailed listing.

    4SO9HsC.jpg 

     

×
×
  • Create New...