Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. WTS FW 17/18 - J61 GT (3l gtx, metal zip, not gtv) - size S full pack, original owner, 9.5/10 minimal wear - $1300 USD shipped worldwide DHL, f+f WTT J58 ws (updated made in europe version) - size M full pack, minimal wear + cash for your J83 ws size M
  3. P24A-KI sold out in seconds. You come for the jackets, stay for the pants
  4. Today
  5. @shredwin_206 Should have it in the next week or so, will take some comparison shots. I was under the impression that it was the same denim, but I also haven't explicitly asked that question either.
  6. @Broark when are you expecting your 1942 jacket ?? could you do a show comparing the 1942 wwii denim next to the s601xx wwii denim? I’ve heard it’s different denim?
  7. Saint James - Duke - SC1946 - Alfred Sargent
  8. DC4 is celebrating their 20th anniversary this year. They will celebrate on June 29th. Anybody is planning to come?
  9. Echoing Duke's sentiments, I've washed my S601xx a ton and the S506xx a few times and haven't noticed much continued shrinkage.
  10. Thanks @Duke Mantee knew you'd have the intel .
  11. WTS j72-ds black size S full packed cond 9/10 like new 1,200$ shipped P38-GT Black size S full packed cond 9/10 like new 1,600$ shipped add 5% for invoice
  12. My war denim was non-wash … which shrank to size and stayed there after more washing. All one-wash FW I have had never shrank noticeably with repeated washes, the usual ‘tightening’ and stiffness from freshly laundered denim aside. I doubt very much there would be significant variation.
  13. What's the shrinkage like on the war denim? The one wash measurements provided by Hoosier are great but l wondered what the final shrinkage is, in other words, beyond the one wash state. For those who have FW war denim - What's your experience?
  14. Yesterday
  15. If you can make that happen, you'd be a Hiro
  16. Kapital, Sugar Cane (not visible), Ooe…and Blundstones which aren’t my fave but the default choice for shitkicking in the mud season here.
  17. an ooe tux flex of such caliber can never be called sedate; oh the bandanna... long may he flutter
  18. understanding very much discussions above; good luck with the socialisation; takes a village to raise the child... (or via Lev Vgotsky; it is through others we becomes ourselves...) 1960s finnish army surplus (m62) / lvc 1870s / pecos
  19. Awesome thank you for the advice everyone. Excited to get these going 🙌🏼
  20. comp or not, I have made my tux order: 46 jacket, 38w jeans (requested hemming to 80cm) cons: I need another jeans like holes in heads I need another jacket like a hole in wallet these jeans are not standard easy wear; slim-ish cut, yet thin material yes; one back pocket, no belt loop for keys etc. ultimate sloppy man baby diaper look pros; nostalgieeee: for those wanting 1990s jeans; this late 1800s models is reference from which Levis late 1990s twisted jeans was running (maybe more y2k refrance, but hey...) nostalgieeeeeeee 2: these were first model I got from lvc back in the late 90s; seeing as I run a trio of tcb, tender, lvc; wanna wee what tcb do with this original pair to build from having multiple lvc examples love of the meta; yes; no.2 as brand positioning... the first two Viktor's voice jackets don't look right (inc. lucky jeans): this is getting there more imo; mostly also tcb is obviously developing its own specific jacket pattern methodology of wide shoulders and sloppy fits: the numbers on this look squarer, even if not 'classic'... pockets looks excellent; both back pocket on jeans and front pocket on jacket yes to the styling in the shoot; not miner cosplay; more skatecore and sloppy old 'uns style: I appreciate that (definitely recommend not skating in any jeans with suspender buttons; had some nasty sk8 face-plants when wearing such jeans: they are placed to puncture skin in painful bony areas...); feeling this is a track suit more than anything... want to see how the fabric ages; every tcb pair I've had has been a journey; even the 10oz bib overalls have a lot to give: I expect these will be giving a lot given the status play of making an 1890s from an original; not had natural indigo from them b4 huge plus: ultimate sloppy man baby diaper look; goes well with pecos and converse... experience: said this in all comp. threads; every tcb jean I have owned has shrunk to tagged waist size; more ppl have dropped out from jeans being too small rather than too big... wearing big on these across time also allows layering needed in winter... yes; 31cm front rise seems small, but is in line with the last cone 1870s lvc offering (picture uploaded here is said w.36 l.34 pair - from raw soaked - line dried, not machine washed ) - the back rise is the core matter... can definitely understand hesitancy in uptake for a comp. - its not classic 5 pocket jawns, jacket has particular character; but it is what it is... a marmite model...
  21. Bump + price updates. Dm if interested, stuff needs to go, help a brother out
  22. Yeah I guess a lot of people would kill for an Ooe jacket. I was just curious seeing a jacket on Ryo.
  23. 1942 506xx landing at stores now, featuring a nicely faded tab.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...